Defining speciesism as “a failure, in attitude or practice, to accord any nonhuman being equal consideration and respect,” this brilliant work critiques speciesism both outside and inside the animal rights movement. Much moral philosophy, legal theory and animal advocacy aimed at advancing nonhuman emancipation, actually perpetuate speciesism, the book demonstrates.
Speciesism examines philosophy, law and activism in terms of three categories: “old speciesism,” “new speciesism,” and “species equality.” Old-speciesists limit rights to humans. SPECIESISM refutes their standard arguments against nonhuman rights. Current law is old-speciesist; legally, nonhumans have no rights. “Animal laws” such as the Humane Slaughter Act afford nonhumans no meaningful protection, Dunayer shows. She, also, explains why welfare campaigns are old-speciesist. Instead of opposing the abuse or killing of nonhuman beings, such campaigns seek only to make abuse or killing less cruel; they propose alternative ways of violating nonhumans’ moral rights. New-speciesists espouse rights for only some nonhumans, those whose minds seem most like humans’.
In addition to devaluing most animals, new-speciesists give greater moral consideration and stronger basic rights to humans than to any nonhumans. They see animal kind as a hierarchy with humans at the top. Dunayer explains why she categorizes such theorists as Peter Singer, Tom Regan and Steven Wise as new-speciesists. Non-speciesists advocate rights for every sentient being.
SPECIESISM makes the case that every creature with a nervous system should be regarded as sentient. The book provides compelling evidence of consciousness in animals often dismissed as insentient. Dunayer argues that every sentient being should possess basic legal rights, including rights to life and liberty. Radically egalitarian, SPECIESISM envisions non-speciesist thought, law and action.